Knowledge, perceptions and practices on antibiotic use among Sri Lankan doctors.

INTRODUCTION: Prescribers have a major role in preventing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through appropriate prescribing. However, in countries like Sri Lanka, where continuous professional development is not mandatory for license renewal and antimicrobial stewardship is not implemented, prescribing practices go largely unchecked. OBJECTIVES: To identify the knowledge on antibiotic use and practices related to antibiotic prescribing among Sri Lankan doctors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020. We used a validated, pretested Google-form based questionnaire with multiple choices, single best answer questions, polar questions (Yes/No) and five-point Likert scale questions. The Google-sheet generated was used for data analysis. Knowledge and practice scores were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 262 respondents, 40.1% were males. Majority (61.8%) were aged 25-35-years and in medical practice for 0-5 years (48.9%) while 46.2% had or were engaged in post graduate studies. Knowledge scores ranged from 98.31% to 46.55% [mean:71.27% (SD±10.83); median:71.18% (IQR 64.4-79.7)]. Most (98.09%) obtained ≥50 marks while 45.8% scored more than the mean. The practice scores ranged from 100% to 0% [mean:65.33% (SD±18.16), median:66.67% (IQR53.3-80)]. The majority (81.3%) scored ≥50 in the practice score while 52.3% achieved more than the mean practice score. The knowledge score and the practice score differed significantly (p<0.001, related sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test) but the knowledge and practice scores were significantly correlated [Spearman correlation, p<0.001, r = 0.343 (Bias corrected 95% CI 0.237-0.448)]. Knowledge scores and the practice scores were significantly higher in those with or undergoing postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: While the knowledge and practice scores were high, and knowledge and practice scores were correlated, the practices score was lower than that of knowledge indicating the need to encourage correct practices through means other than solely promoting knowledge.

'They eat it like sweets': A mixed methods study of antibiotic perceptions and their use among patients, prescribers and pharmacists in a district hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a growing public health threat. In Afghanistan, high levels of indiscriminate antibiotic use exist, and healthcare programmes are not informed by understanding of local attitudes towards rational antibiotic use. Médecins Sans Frontières is an international non-governmental organization providing healthcare services to the Ahmad Shah Baba (ASB) District Hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan, since 2009. This mixed-methods study aimed to explore the perceptions and attitudes toward antibiotics among patients, prescribers, and pharmacists in the ASB District hospital outpatient department. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Knowledge of antibiotics including their purpose and function, how and why they are used, and drivers for choice of antibiotic was examined at patient, prescriber, and provider-level. The first phase of the study, an exploratory qualitative component using an interpretative approach, was used to inform the second phase, a structured survey. Thirty-six interviews were conducted with 39 participants (21 patients or caretakers and 18 hospital health workers). Three hundred and fifty-one (351) patients and caretakers completed the second phase, the structured survey. This study found that poor knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance is a driving factor for inappropriate use of antibiotics. Participant perceptions of living in a polluted environment drove the high demand and perceived 'need' for antibiotics: patients, doctors and pharmacists alike consider dirty and dusty living conditions as causes of 'disease' in the body, requiring antibiotics to 'clean' and 'strengthen' it. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need for strategies to improve awareness and knowledge of the general public, improve practice of doctors and pharmacists, regulate antibiotic dispensing in private pharmacies, and implement antibiotic stewardship in hospitals.

Thailand's national strategic plan on antimicrobial resistance: progress and challenges.

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat that affects all countries. The Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance and the United Nations Political Declaration on antimicrobial resistance set standards for countries to resolve antimicrobial resistance challenges under the One Health approach. We assess progress and challenges in implementing Thailand's national strategic plan on antimicrobial resistance 2017-2022, discuss interim outcomes and share lessons learnt. Major progress includes: establishing a national governance mechanism that leads high-impact policy on antimicrobial resistance and consolidates actions and multisectoral collaboration; creating a monitoring system and platform to track implementation of the strategic plan; and converting strategies of the strategic plan into actions such as controlling the distribution and use of antimicrobials in humans and animals. Interim results indicate that antimicrobial consumption in animals has nearly halved (exceeding the national goal of a 30% reduction) whereas other goals have not yet reached their targets. We have learnt that elevating antimicrobial resistance to high-level visibility and establishing a national governance mechanism is an important first step, and a monitoring and evaluation system should be developed in parallel with implementation. Securing funds is crucial. Policy coherence is needed to avoid duplication of actions. Highly ambitious goals, although yet to be achieved, can advance actions beyond expectations. Political commitment and collaboration across different sectors will continue to play important roles but might not be sustained without a well-designed governance structure to support long-term actions to address antimicrobial resistance.

La résistance aux antimicrobiens fait peser une sérieuse menace sur la planète tout entière. Le Plan d'action mondial pour combattre la résistance aux antimicrobiens ainsi que la Déclaration politique des Nations Unies sur la résistance aux agents antimicrobiens ont défini des normes pour les pays, afin qu'ils puissent faire face aux enjeux liés à la résistance aux antimicrobiens selon l'approche «One Health¼. Nous avons évalué les progrès et défis de la mise en œuvre du plan stratégique national de la Thaïlande en la matière pour 2017­2022, mais aussi discuté des résultats provisoires et partagé les enseignements tirés. Parmi les principaux progrès accomplis figurent l'établissement d'un mécanisme de gouvernance national pour mener une politique à impact élevé sur la résistance aux antimicrobiens, renforcer les actions et favoriser la collaboration intersectorielle; la création d'un système de surveillance et d'une plateforme pour suivre la mise en œuvre du plan stratégique; et enfin, la conversion des stratégies du plan en actions telles que le contrôle de la distribution et de l'usage des antimicrobiens chez les humains et les animaux. Les résultats provisoires indiquent que la consommation d'antimicrobiens chez les animaux a diminué de moitié (ce qui est supérieur à l'objectif national d'une réduction de 30%), tandis que les autres objectifs n'ont pas encore été atteints. Nous avons constaté qu'accroître la visibilité de la résistance aux antimicrobiens et instaurer un mécanisme de gouvernance national constituaient des étapes cruciales, et qu'un système de surveillance et d'évaluation devait être développé parallèlement à la mise en œuvre. L'obtention de financements est elle aussi essentielle. Une politique cohérente est nécessaire pour éviter de multiplier les actions similaires. Fixer des objectifs très ambitieux, même s'ils ne sont pas encore atteints, permet en outre de faire progresser les actions au-delà des attentes. Enfin, l'engagement politique et la collaboration entre différents secteurs continueront à jouer un rôle prépondérant, mais ne pourront peut-être pas se poursuivre sans une structure de gouvernance bien conçue, capable de soutenir des actions à long terme visant à remédier à la résistance aux antimicrobiens.

La resistencia a los antimicrobianos es una grave amenaza que afecta a todos los países. El Plan de Acción Mundial sobre la resistencia a los antimicrobianos y la Declaración Política de las Naciones Unidas sobre la resistencia a los antimicrobianos establecen normas para que los países resuelvan los problemas de resistencia a los antimicrobianos en el marco del enfoque «Una única salud¼. Evaluamos los avances y los desafíos en la aplicación del plan estratégico nacional de Tailandia sobre la resistencia a los antimicrobianos 2017-2022, analizamos los resultados provisionales y compartimos las lecciones aprendidas. Entre los principales avances se encuentran: el establecimiento de un mecanismo de gobernanza nacional que lidera la política de alto impacto sobre la resistencia a los antimicrobianos y consolida las acciones y la colaboración multisectorial; la creación de un sistema de seguimiento y una plataforma para seguir la aplicación del plan estratégico; y la conversión de las estrategias del plan estratégico en acciones como el control de la distribución y el uso de antimicrobianos en humanos y animales. Los resultados provisionales indican que el consumo de antimicrobianos en animales se ha reducido casi a la mitad (superando el objetivo nacional de una reducción del 30 %), mientras que otros objetivos aún no han alcanzado sus metas. Hemos aprendido que elevar la resistencia a los antimicrobianos a una visibilidad de alto nivel y establecer un mecanismo de gobernanza nacional es un primer paso importante, y que debe desarrollarse un sistema de seguimiento y evaluación en paralelo a la implementación. Asegurar los fondos es crucial. La coherencia política es necesaria para evitar la duplicación de acciones. Unos objetivos muy ambiciosos, aunque todavía no se hayan alcanzado, pueden hacer avanzar las acciones más allá de las expectativas. El compromiso político y la colaboración entre los distintos sectores seguirán desempeñando un papel importante, pero podrían no mantenerse sin una estructura de gobernanza bien diseñada que apoye las acciones a largo plazo para hacer frente a la resistencia a los antimicrobianos.

Perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Surgical Site Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among operated patients. In spite of the accessibility of universal and national guidelines for surgical prophylaxis, recent studies surveying the present routine of prophylaxis have demonstrated overutilization of a wide range antibacterial medication for a single patient. Few studies have shown qualitatively factors influencing this and perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done in Tanzania. OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital. METHODS: A qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with surgeons was conducted in English by the primary investigator. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Systematic text condensation by Malterud was used for data analysis. FINDINGS: Fourteen surgeons and obstetrics and gynaecologists participated. Their perceptions were summarized into three main categories: Inadequate data to support practice; one who sees the patient decides the antibiotic prophylaxis; prolonged antibiotic use for fear of unknown. The participants perceived that choice of antibiotic should be based on local hospital data for bacterial resistance pattern, however the hospital guidelines and data for surgical site infection rates are unknown. Fear of getting infection and anticipating complications led to prolonged antibiotics use. CONCLUSION: The study provides an understanding of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use and its implementation challenges. This was partly expressed by unavailability of local data and guidelines to enhance practice. To improve this, there is a need of guidelines that incorporates local resistance surveillance data and enhanced antibiotic stewardship programmes. A strong consideration should be placed into ways to combat the fears of surgeons for complications, as these significantly affect the current practise with use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Improving Care and Outcomes for Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) is a common cause of hospitalization with associated morbidity. To improve the care of pediatric MSKI, our objectives were to achieve 3 specific aims within 24 months of our quality improvement (QI) interventions: (1) 50% reduction in peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) use, (2) 25% reduction in sedations per patient, and (3) 50% reduction in empirical vancomycin administration. METHODS: We implemented 4 prospective QI interventions at our tertiary children's hospital: (1) provider education, (2) centralization of admission location, (3) coordination of radiology-orthopedic communication, and (4) implementation of an MSKI infection algorithm and order set. We included patients 6 months to 18 years of age with acute osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, or pyomyositis and excluded patients with complex chronic conditions or ICU admission. We used statistical process control charts to analyze outcomes over 2 general periods: baseline (January 2015-October 17, 2016) and implementation (October 18, 2016-April 2019). RESULTS: In total, 224 patients were included. The mean age was 6.1 years, and there were no substantive demographic or clinical differences between baseline and implementation groups. There was an 81% relative reduction in PICC use (centerline shift 54%-11%; 95% confidence interval 70-92) and 33% relative reduction in sedations per patient (centerline shift 1.8-1.2; 95% confidence interval 21-46). Empirical vancomycin use did not change (centerline 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary MSKI QI interventions were associated with a significant decrease in the use of PICCs and sedations per patient but not empirical vancomycin administration.

Term newborns at risk for early-onset neonatal sepsis: Clinical surveillance versus systematic paraclinical test.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset neonatal sepsis is a rare but potentially lethal infection that is very often suspected in daily practice. Previous national guidelines recommended the use of systematic paraclinical tests for healthy term newborns with suspected infection. These guidelines were updated in 2017 by the French Health Authority (Haute Autorité de santé), and promote initial clinical monitoring taking into account the infectious risk level for term and near-term born infants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the new recommendations on antibiotic therapy prescription and invasive tests, and on the outcomes of infants born from 36weeks' gestation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the management and the outcome of neonates born from 36weeks' gestation at the level III University Hospital of Nancy, according to their infectious risk level during two periods, before and after the update of national recommendations: from July 1 to December 31, 2017, versus July 1 to December 31, 2018. Data were retrospectively collected from the infants' files. This study compared the number and length of antibiotic treatment and the number of invasive tests, the number of documented infections, the number and length of hospitalization, and mortality between the two periods. RESULTS: During the first period, among 1248 eligible newborns, 643 presented an infectious risk factor, versus 1152 newborns with 343 having an infectious risk factor during the second period. Antibiotic treatment was initiated for 18 newborns during the first period (1.4%) and for nine during the second (0.8%) (P=0.13). The mean (SD) duration of the antibiotic treatment was longer in the first than in the second period: 6.3±2days vs. 3.1±2.3days (P=0.003). There was no death related to neonatal infection. A total of 1052 blood samples were collected during the first period versus 51 during the second (P<0.01). There was no documented infection. In the first period, there were 18 newborns (1.4%) hospitalized for suspected infection versus nine (0.8%) in the second period (P=0.13). The duration of hospitalization was 5.7±1.7days in the first period versus 5.2±3days in the second (P=0.33). CONCLUSION: In this study, the application of the new guidelines enabled a reduction of antibiotic exposure and a reduction of invasive tests without additional risk.

A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) can often be diagnosed based solely on symptoms and should be treated with a short course of narrow spectrum antibiotics. However, clinicians often order urine analyses and prescribe long courses of broad spectrum antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study are: 1) Understand how primary care providers and residents clinically approach UTIs and 2) to understand specific opportunities, based on provider type, to target future antibiotic stewardship interventions. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews of community primary care providers (n = 15) and internal medicine residents (n = 15) in St. Louis, Missouri from 2018-2019. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate participant preferences for possible interventions. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and coded by two independent researchers using a combination inductive and deductive approach. KEY RESULTS: Several common themes emerged. Both providers and residents ordered urine tests to "confirm" presence of urinary tract infections. Antibiotic prescription decisions were often based on historical practice and anecdotal experience rather than local susceptibility data or clinical practice guidelines. Community providers were more comfortable treating patients over the phone than residents and tended to prescribe longer courses of antibiotics. Both community providers and residents voiced frustrations with guidelines being difficult to easily incorporate due to length and extraneous information. Preferences for receiving and incorporating guidelines into practice varied. Both groups felt benchmarking would improve prescribing practices but had reservations about implementation. Community providers preferred pragmatic clinical decision support systems and nurse triage algorithms. Residents preferred order sets. CONCLUSIONS: Significant opportunities exist to optimize urinary tract infection management among residents and community providers. Multifaceted interventions that include provider education, synthesis of guidelines, and pragmatic clinical decision support systems are needed to improve antibiotic prescribing and diagnostic testing; optimal interventions to improve UTI management may vary based on provider training level.

Analysis of the impact of antimicrobial management and rational use of antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE: The scientific antimicrobial management strategy (AMS) was used to standardise the clinical use of antibiotics and optimise the anti-infection treatment protocol. METHODS: By formulating antibiotic use indicators and policy interventions, carrying out prescription audits and drug analysis by pharmacists, and establishing an early warning mechanism for bacterial drug resistance, we formed a long-term and scientific antimicrobial management strategy. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, the clinical antibiotics use indicators appeared to trend downward. The rate of antibiotic use in outpatients, the rate of antibiotic use in hospitalised patients, and the antimicrobial use density decreased by 40.36%, 20.93%, and 10.71%, respectively, and the per capita drug cost of antibiotics in outpatients and inpatients decreased. The microbiological susceptibility test rate of antibiotics in hospitalised patients increased each year, and the resistance rate of the main detected bacteria did not significantly increase in the last 6 years. In the evaluation of rational drug use, the use of antibiotics has become more reasonable and standardised, and irrational drug use has been significantly reduced, but we still need to strengthen the optimisation of treatment prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific management can promote the rational use of antibiotics, reduce the expense of drug use and slow the development of drug resistance, but we need to further optimise the prescription of antibiotics to improve the level of drug treatment.

Antibiotic consumption study in two hospitals in Asmara from 2014 to 2018 using WHO's defined daily dose (DDD) methodology.

This study compares the antibiotic consumption rates over a period of five years in two hospitals in Eritrea, Orotta National Referral and Teaching Hospital (ONRTH) and Hazhaz Zonal Referral Hospital (HZRH). Antibiotic consumption is an important parameter in the study of antibiotic use. However, no published data on consumption rates exist for these two hospitals, thus the aim of the study is to measure and compare a five year antibiotic consumption trends of the two hospitals' medical wards using Defined Daily Dose per 100 bed-days (DDD/100-BD). Antibiotics dispensed from January 2014 to December 2018 were considered. Non-parametric Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for comparison of consumption, while non-parametric Friedman's test measured annual rates. The total antibiotic consumption in the HZRH was almost double that of ONRTH. The analysis showed that antibiotic consumption in ONRTH was significantly decreased from 2014 to 2018 while there was no significant difference in consumption in HZRH. Benzyl penicillin was the most consumed antibiotic in HZRH and ONRTH throughout the study period at 87.8DDD/100-BD and 35.4 DDD/100-BD respectively. Ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin were among the most commonly consumed antibiotics in both hospitals. Establishment of Antibiotic stewardship program would benefit both hospitals greatly, and further studies need to be done to establish the national antibiotic consumption baseline.

Outpatient fluoroquinolone prescribing patterns before and after US FDA boxed warning.

OBJECTIVES: Fluoroquinolones are routinely overprescribed for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI), acute sinusitis, and acute bronchitis. In 2016, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated the boxed warning on fluoroquinolones, recommending against their use as first-line agents for the routine pharmacologic management of uUTI, acute sinusitis, and acute bronchitis in patients who have other treatment options. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the 2016 expanded boxed warning was associated with decreased fluoroquinolone prescription rates for these three diagnoses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed antibiotics prescribed at a single, large, academic outpatient center for these three diagnoses between January 2013 and May 2018. Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare the rate of fluoroquinolone prescriptions before and after the May 2016 FDA boxed warning. RESULTS: A total of 10 087 antibiotic prescriptions for these three diagnoses were examined. There was no significant change in fluoroquinolone prescription rates after the FDA boxed warning. The majority of inappropriate fluoroquinolone prescriptions were given for the management of uUTI. CONCLUSION: The 2016 US FDA boxed warning against fluoroquinolone use for uUTI, acute sinusitis, and acute bronchitis was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the rate of fluoroquinolone prescriptions for these diagnoses. Additional research is needed to define how US FDA boxed warnings may be incorporated into broader antibiotic stewardship programs to decrease overuse of fluoroquinolones and avoid adverse effects of the drug class, including Clostridioides difficile infections and emergence of resistant organisms.

Successful improvement of antibiotic prescribing at Primary Care in Andalusia following the implementation of an antimicrobial guide through multifaceted interventions: An interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Most effective strategies designed to improve antimicrobial prescribing have multiple approaches. We assessed the impact of the implementation of a rigorous antimicrobial guide and subsequent multifaceted interventions aimed at improving antimicrobial use in Primary Care. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was designed. Interventions aimed at achieving a good implementation of the guide consisted of the development of electronic decision support tools, local training meetings, regional workshops, conferences, targets for rates of antibiotic prescribing linked to financial incentives, feedback on antibiotic prescribing, and the implementation of a structured educational antimicrobial stewardship program. Interventions started in 2011, and continued until 2018. Outcomes: rates of antibiotics use, calculated into defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants-day (DID). An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted. The study ran from January 2004 until December 2018. RESULTS: Overall annual antibiotic prescribing rates showed increasing trends in the pre-intervention period. Interventions were followed by significant changes on trends with a decline over time in antibiotic prescribing. Overall antibiotic rates dropped by 28% in the Aljarafe Area and 22% in Andalusia between 2011 and 2018, at rates of -0.90 DID per year (95%CI:-1.05 to -0.75) in Aljarafe, and -0.78 DID (95%CI:-0.95 to -0.60) in Andalusia. Reductions occurred at the expense of the strong decline of penicillins use (33% in Aljarafe, 25% in Andalusia), and more precisely, amoxicillin clavulanate, whose prescription plummeted by around 50%. Quinolones rates decreased before interventions, and continued to decline following interventions with more pronounced downward trends. Decreasing cephalosporins trends continued to decline, at a lesser extent, following interventions in Andalusia. Trends of macrolides rates went from a downward trend to an upward trend from 2011 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Multifaceted interventions following the delivering of a rigorous antimicrobial guide, maintained in long-term, with strong institutional support, could led to sustained reductions in antibiotic prescribing in Primary Care.

Antibiotic de-escalation on internal medicine services with rounding pharmacists compared to services without.

Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs ensure antibiotic therapy is used appropriately and includes de-escalation when clinical status or culture data indicates broad-spectrum agents are no longer needed. Although the impact of infectious diseases clinical pharmacists has been well documented, there is limited research evaluating the impact of adult internal medicine clinical pharmacists on broad-spectrum antibiotic de-escalation while rounding on internal medicine teams. Objective To determine if broad-spectrum antibiotics were de-escalated more regularly and more rapidly in patients on internal medicine services with a rounding pharmacist at the bedside compared to internal medicine services without rounding pharmacists. Setting A single 700 bed academic medical center in the United States of America. Method This was a prospective observational cohort chart review. Main outcome measure The primary endpoint was appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic de-escalation within 72 h or upon return of culture results. Result A total of 64 patients were included in this study with 39 in the pharmacist group and 25 in the no pharmacist group. De-escalation occurred in 35/39 patients on services with pharmacists and in 13/25 patients on services without pharmacists (p = 0.001). In terms of mean days of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, services with rounding pharmacists saw patients on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage for an average of 2.12 days of their duration of therapy compared to 2.8 days in those without pharmacists (p = 0.821). Services with rounding pharmacists saw patients on Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage for 2 days of their length of stay compared to 3 days in those without pharmacists (0.398). Conclusion This data shows that broad-spectrum antibiotics were de-escalated more frequently on medicine services with rounding pharmacists compared to services without pharmacists.